|
I am using this book for a class. It is actually very readable and has lots of good clear information.
The book is very informative,easy to read, and enjoyable. I wish I would have read as an interior design student, but I wouldn't have appreciated it as a 21 year-old.
It's twice as thick and scary at first site. This version is so much better than the old one. Got a nice CD in the back to use for forms, nice. This is very good. I haven't read the whole thing though. If using it to study for the NCIDQ, better start reading way in advance, it's long and small print.
They should instead inform the contractor and the client of such inconsistencies and NOT recommend a remedy. Overall its a useful book, but I wouldn't call it great. And some things seem outdated. For example, the author states that if a designer witnesses work on a job site that is not in conformance with drawings they should intervene and stop work. Is this 1960.
With relating the examples to codes of ethics, these examples are pointless.There seem to be some factual errors too. Contract law clearly states a designer should NEVER intervene. It is up to the contractor to decide the appropriate remedy and the client to determine the appropriate contract action to take. Forcing women to wear skirts violates employment law and the author should know this. Its a good book, but there are some things I think need to be reworked.There are real-world examples that are kinda hokey.There are lots of ethical "what would you do" examples with no follow up about whether or not such an example is an ethics violation or not.
HELLO. In the chapter on preparing marketing presentations, the author states that women "MAY" be permitted to wear trousers to a presentation depending on the firm they work for.
good information for starting a design business (not just interior) or to rewrite an existing plan that needs some freshening up.
|